- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:33:10 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=838
link@pobox.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |856
nThis| |
Target Milestone|--- |0.7.0
------- Additional Comments From link@pobox.com 2004-09-11 13:33 -------
We'll need to ability to set the Content-Type for fragment validation in any case, and we should be
able to treat this similarly to other widgets (DOCTYPE, Charset) by issuing a warning on mismatches
and other suboptimal behaviour.
I'm somwhat ambivalent about how and if we should react specificly to XPSP2; this is a long
standing problem, but XPSP2 may exacerbate it sufficiently for us to react.
I wonder if we should issue a note in the news section on :80 that explains the situation with XPSP2
and mentions that we haven't decided what to do about it yet.
Adding blocker on Bug #856 and targetting 0.7.0; until we figure out the "what", "if", and "when" of it.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2004 13:33:11 UTC