W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-cvs@w3.org > September 2004

[Bug 856] [RELEASE] 0.7.0 Release Metabug

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:33:03 +0000
To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1C4QAh-0004eB-Mj@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=856





------- Additional Comments From bjoern@hoehrmann.de  2004-09-06 20:33 -------
Here are Bugs that are better addressed later than 0.7.0

Bug #749 -- fixing this would suggest quite some re-design
Bug #862 -- major and controversial layout change
Bug #336 -- major and controversial change esp. if XHTML 1.1 is involved
Bug #301 -- I think this is better addressed with using S::P::O than an interim 
Bug hack
Bug #298 -- I agree with Terje's comment
Bug #297 -- I also suggest postponing such changes until S::P::O happens
Bug #197 -- this should wait until we use Encode.pm which provides similar means
Bug #194 -- ISO-8859-11 won't be registered any time soon, pointless to wait 
for Bug it
Bug #193 -- wait for Encode.pm
Bug #192 -- this is a major and problematic change, lets do this later
Bug #139 -- should wait for S::P::O
Bug #131 -- I am opposed to do this for *all* XHTML docs, should wait for 
S::P::O too
Bug #98 -- I am not too fond of the idea to list all these in the form
Bug #78 -- *Very* unlikely that this will happen in the next few weeks
Bug #75 -- this requires some major work and there are design issues...
Bug #68 -- better addressed with a proper S::P::O infrastructure
Bug #65 -- well... there is no solution yet
Bug #63 -- I agree with comment #1




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 13:12:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:02:07 UTC