- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:33:03 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=856 ------- Additional Comments From bjoern@hoehrmann.de 2004-09-06 20:33 ------- Here are Bugs that are better addressed later than 0.7.0 Bug #749 -- fixing this would suggest quite some re-design Bug #862 -- major and controversial layout change Bug #336 -- major and controversial change esp. if XHTML 1.1 is involved Bug #301 -- I think this is better addressed with using S::P::O than an interim Bug hack Bug #298 -- I agree with Terje's comment Bug #297 -- I also suggest postponing such changes until S::P::O happens Bug #197 -- this should wait until we use Encode.pm which provides similar means Bug #194 -- ISO-8859-11 won't be registered any time soon, pointless to wait for Bug it Bug #193 -- wait for Encode.pm Bug #192 -- this is a major and problematic change, lets do this later Bug #139 -- should wait for S::P::O Bug #131 -- I am opposed to do this for *all* XHTML docs, should wait for S::P::O too Bug #98 -- I am not too fond of the idea to list all these in the form Bug #78 -- *Very* unlikely that this will happen in the next few weeks Bug #75 -- this requires some major work and there are design issues... Bug #68 -- better addressed with a proper S::P::O infrastructure Bug #65 -- well... there is no solution yet Bug #63 -- I agree with comment #1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 13:12:55 UTC