- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:45:37 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=702
ewexler@stickdog.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
------- Additional Comments From ewexler@stickdog.com 2004-10-27 12:45 -------
<http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FBugs%2FPublic%2Fattachment.cgi%3Fid%3D377%26action%3Dview&usermedium=all>
...is fine.
<http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FBugs%2FPublic%2Fattachment.cgi%3Fid%3D378%26action%3Dview&usermedium=all>
...raises an error.
According to CSS 2.1, this is exactly as it should be. The BOM (byte-order mark,
U+FEFF) is not distinguished in the scanner from any other character outside of
the Latin-1 repertoire. Thus the BOM starts an identifier, which starts a rule set.
CSS3 will probably change the regulations to account for the special meaning of
a BOM.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 12:45:37 UTC