W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-cvs@w3.org > May 2004

2002/css-validator BUGS.html,1.9,1.10

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@dev.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 03:53:42 +0000
To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Message-Id: <20040529035342.A72DA4A84E@hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2002/css-validator
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv31945

Modified Files:
	BUGS.html 
Log Message:
pointers to bugzilla and cleanup for outdated bug reports

Index: BUGS.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/css-validator/BUGS.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10
--- BUGS.html	12 Jul 2002 21:11:58 -0000	1.9
+++ BUGS.html	29 May 2004 03:53:40 -0000	1.10
@@ -50,12 +50,12 @@
 	<p>
 	  The validator doesn't say "only for block-level elements". The bug
 	  comes from me. I know where it is but don't have time to find a
-	  solution.
+	  solution. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=758">Bug #758</a>)
 	</p>
       </li>
       <li>
 	<p>
-	  "iso-8859-15" not supported.
+	  "iso-8859-15" not supported. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=180">Bug #180</a>)
 	</p>
       </li>
       <li>
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
 	  The CSS validator will not acknowledge CSS loaded via a
 	  <code>&lt;link></code> which does not explicitly declare
 	  `type="text/css"', even when the server correctly serves the
-	  stylesheet as text/css.
+	  stylesheet as text/css. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=759">Bug #759</a>)
 	</p>
       </li>
     <li>
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
 	  did not generate a warning...
 	</p>
 	<pre>h1 { margin-left: 2%; ; }</pre>
+        <p>(<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=760">Bug #760</a>)</p>
       </li>
     <li>
 	<p>
@@ -203,15 +204,6 @@
       </li>
     <li>
 	<p>
-	  Properties for media the property doesn't apply to marks style
-	  sheet as invalid, e.g. @media screen { voice-family: foo } The
-	  CSS Level 2 recommendation doesn't say such style sheets are
-	  invalid. The error should be turned into a warning. (Reported
-	  by Rob Chandanais)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-    <li>
-	<p>
 	  Alan J. Flavell argued, that the Validator should also
 	  complain 'background-color: transparent' as if
 	  background-color has been omitted, see <a
Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 23:53:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:02:06 UTC