[Bug 787] Parse Error - [empty string]

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=787

stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.o
                   |                            |rg



------- Additional Comments From stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org  2004-06-22 08:29 -------
It seems there's problems with the parser from where I sit...

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org/

    * Line: 0 Context : .pagetitle

      Invalid number : font-sizexx-large is not a font-size value : xx-large
    * Line: 0 Context : .sitetitle

      Invalid number : font-sizex-large is not a font-size value : x-large
    * Line: 0 Context : .navbar

      Invalid number : borderParse Error - [empty string]
    * Line: 0 Context : .navlink

      Invalid number : color#666 is not a color value : #666
    * Line: 0 Context : .navlink

      Invalid number : backgroundToo many values or values are not recognized : #ccc
    * Line: 0 Context : .navlink:hover

      Invalid number : color#ccc is not a color value : #ccc
    * Line: 0 Context : .navlink:hover

      Invalid number : backgroundToo many values or values are not recognized : #333
    * Line: 0 Context : .navitem

      Invalid number : color#666 is not a color value : #666
    * Line: 0 Context : .navitem:hover

      Invalid number : color#ccc is not a color value : #ccc
    * Line: 0 Context : .footer

      Invalid number : font-sizesmall is not a font-size value : small

Now... the "Line 0" looks suspect, to me it looks like its referencing an
undefined variable -- or it's not incrementing the variable properly.

Also, font-size: xx-large is valid CSS... Most of the other errors appear bogus
too.  Can someone please check this?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2004 08:29:58 UTC