2002/css-validator BUGS.html,1.14,1.15

Update of /sources/public/2002/css-validator
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv10657

Modified Files:
	BUGS.html 
Log Message:
remove superfluous issue list

Index: BUGS.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/css-validator/BUGS.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -d -r1.14 -r1.15
--- BUGS.html	9 Jun 2004 22:26:45 -0000	1.14
+++ BUGS.html	9 Jun 2004 22:29:21 -0000	1.15
@@ -33,229 +33,6 @@
 <li><a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=CSSValidator">New CSS Validator issue</a></li>
 </ul>
 
-<!--
-    <ol>
-      <li>
-	<pre>
- H1 { 
-  elevation: 50rad; 
- }
-	</pre>
-	<p>
-	  Here I have an error and a bug.
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  In first, angle are always convert in degree, and in this case, it
-	  should be not. In second, the validator said 50rad == 50deg, so this
-	  is a big bug.
-	</p>
-      </li>
-    </ol>
-    
-    <h1 class="center">CSS Validator version 2.0 : bugs list</h1>
-    <ol>
-      <li>
-	<pre>a {
-   text-align: "$";
-}</pre>
-	<p>
-	  The validator doesn't say "only for block-level elements". The bug
-	  comes from me. I know where it is but don't have time to find a
-	  solution. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=758">Bug #758</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  "iso-8859-15" not supported. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=180">Bug #180</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  XHTML user agents are required to remove comments from XHTML documents
- before further processing, hence e.g.
-	</p>
-	<pre>&lt;style type="text/css">&lt;!--
-     body { volume: 100% }
---&gt;&lt;/style></pre>
-	<p>
-	  is to be ignored by those user agents. The CSS Validator
-	  should give a strong warning when encountering this and ignore
-	  the rules inside such comments. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=761">Bug #761</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  The CSS validator will not acknowledge CSS loaded via a
-	  <code>&lt;link></code> which does not explicitly declare
-	  `type="text/css"', even when the server correctly serves the
-	  stylesheet as text/css. (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=759">Bug #759</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-    <li>
-	<p>
-	  I have just discovered that this CSS rule, with two semicolons,
-	  did not generate a warning...
-	</p>
-	<pre>h1 { margin-left: 2%; ; }</pre>
-        <p>(<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=760">Bug #760</a>)</p>
-      </li>
-    <li>
-	<p>
-	  I have found something, maybe already known, The HTML
-	  validator and the CSS validator can't detect this file is
-	  wrong :
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  <a href='http://www.la-grange.net/2002/04/03-styleatt-wo-meta'>http://www.la-grange.net/2002/04/03-styleatt-wo-meta</a>
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  This file has a style attribute <code>style="color: green;
-	  border: solid red;"</code> but no metaname specifying the
-	  default stylesheet language. So by definition, the file is not
-	  a valid one :
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  HTML 4.01 says in the chapter "Style Sheets in HTML documents
-	  (14.2.1)":
-	</p>
-	<blockquote cite='http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/present/styles.html#h-14.2.1'>
-	  <p>
-	    "Documents that include elements that set the style
-	    attribute but which don't define a default style sheet
-	    language are incorrect."
-	  </p>
-	</blockquote>
-	<p>
-	  2002-04-03 The HTML validator says the file is valid.
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  2002-04-03 The CSS validator does not find any style and says
-	  there are no errors.
-	</p>
-         <p>(<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=762">Bug #762</a>)</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  some problem with the validator for profile = mobile:
-	  attributes can not be used with mobile profile
-	</p>
-	<pre>body {
-  margin-top: 0.5em;
-  margin-bottom: 0.5em;
-  margin-left: 0.5em;
-  margin-right: 2em;
-  font-family: verdana;
-  background-color: green;
-  color: red;
-}
-
-.s1 {
-   width: 10em;
-   background-color: red;
-}
-
-.s2 {
-   width: 20em;
-}
-
-.smalltext {
-   font-size: 0.75em;
-}</pre>
-<p>(<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=763">Bug 763</a>)</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  While I was using the very useful CSS validator, I noticed
-	  something strange, perhaps a little bug...
-	</p>
-	<p> 
-	  With the following style definition :
-	</p>
-<pre>BODY {
-   background-position: center 90%;
- }</pre>
-	<p>
-	  I would say that this definition is wrong because I should not
-	  mix "center" and a percentage.
-	</p>
-	<p>
-	  But the fact is that no error or warning is reported, and
-	  this is the result of the validator :
-	</p>
-<pre>BODY {
-      background-position : null null;
-}</pre>
-      <p>(<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=764">Bug #764</a>)</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>Problem with <a href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2002Mar/0031.html'>PHP</a>?
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  According to the element index, "transparent" as well as
-	  "inherit" are legitimate colors for border-color.  The CSS
-	  parser gripes about it however. See <a
-	  href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2002Mar/att-0024/00-part'>message</a>.
-          (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=765">Bug #765</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-
-      
-    <li>
-	<p>
-	  Pretty printer removes attribute selector, i.e.  '#id[id] {
-	  position : fixed }' becomes '#id { position : fixed }' on
-	  output. (Reported by Bj&ouml;rn H&ouml;hrmann)
-          (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=766">Bug #766</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  Pretty printer fails to add quote marks for e.g.
-	  'elem[p="100"] { }', i.e. users get an invalid style sheet
-	  since all values but ident tokens must be quoted. (Reported by
-	  Philip Pawley)
-          (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=767">Bug #767</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-    <li>
-	<p>
-	  Alan J. Flavell argued, that the Validator should also
-	  complain 'background-color: transparent' as if
-	  background-color has been omitted, see <a
-	  href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2001Aug/0072.html'>message</a>
-          (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=768">Bug #768</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  The Validator passes the Accept-Language HTTP header to the
-	  server where the code to validate comes from. This conflicts
-	  sometimes with content negotiation facilities, i.e. you cannot
-	  validate pages written in languages you do not accept. I
-	  suggest adding '*' at the end of the list of accepted
-	  languages. (Reported by Bj&ouml;rn H&ouml;hrmann)
-          (<a href="http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=769">Bug #769</a>)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  It produces sometimes invalid XHTML, try to validate e.g.
-	  <a href='http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sociables2.org%2FEvent%2Fevent_detail.asp%3Fid%3D476&amp;warning=1&amp;profile=css2'>test</a>
-	  (Reported by Daniel Barclay)
-	</p>
-      </li>
-      <li>
-	<p>
-	  <a
-	     href='http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2001Sep/0008.html'>Karl's report</a>
-	</p>
-      </li>
-    </ol>
-
--->
-
     <hr class="large" />
     <a class="right" href="http://validator.w3.org/">
       <img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 18:29:23 UTC