- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 09:35:44 +0100
- To: "Suriya N" <suriya@arathy.com>
- Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 08:36:13 UTC
On 11 May 2016, at 5:43, Suriya N wrote: > I have been trying to check the conformity of some CSS3 stylesheets > and I believe the W3C CSS validator must be a little out of date since > using valid mark-up for the CSS3 animation property returns "Property > animation doesn't exist" even though it is implemented in Firefox 5+, > Chrome, Safari and Opera with -moz-, -webkit-, -webkit- and -o- > prefixed respectively. > > Similarly, using valid markup for the @keyframes property returns > "Sorry, the at-rule @keyframes is not implemented." even though it is > implemented in Firefox 4+, Chrome, Safari and Opera with -moz-, > -webkit-, -webkit- and -o- prefixed respectively. Given valid CSS using `animation` and `@keyframes`, my [test case][1] is marked a valid by the CSS validation service. It sounds like you expect experimental, prefixed, vendor specific implementations to be valid CSS. They are not. [1]: http://test-cases.dorward.me.uk/validator/animation/ -- David Dorward http://dorward.co.uk/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 08:36:13 UTC