- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:39:43 +0200
- To: Secondhand Skellefteċ <secundhand@skelleftea.pingst.se>
- CC: www-validator-css@w3.org, owe.arneholt@gmail.com
2012-03-12 15:32, Secondhand Skellefteċ wrote: > Try to validate http://www.pksecondhand/galleri_1_300_4.css The domain name is missing; the correct address appears to be in the .se domain, e.g. http://www.pksecondhand.se/galleri_1_300_4.css > What it reports doesn't make sense to me ! Most of the W3C CSS Validator messages about it are related to the use of browser-specific prefixes such as -moz- and -webkit-. Such properties, though useful to get better browser coverage at present, do not conform to CSS 3 syntax. You can remove such messages from the set of error messages, turning them to warnings, by selecting "Vendor Extensions: Warnings", in the validator's user interface. This would leave the messages about transition-property and transition-duration, which apparently aren't known to the validator, despite being part of the CSS Transitions draft http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions (possibly because that draft does not seem to be making progress: the current version is from 2009). So if you wish to check that your use of those properties conforms to the draft, I'm afraid you need to do that manually. Finally, there's the message 0 is not a box-shadow value : 0 0 15px 2px #000 about line 106. The validator seems to be too picky: it wants the color to appear first, and as a color name, so that box-shadow: black 0 0 15px 2px passes. I don't know why the validator applies a syntax much more limited than that in the CSS Backgrounds and Borders draft http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/ Yucca
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 12:40:20 UTC