- From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:43:34 -0800
- To: Thomas Gambet <tgambet@w3.org>
- Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org, Cyrille Moureaux <cyrille@google.com>
(+Cyrille Moureaux) Thomas, everyone interested in the subject, > > > Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific > > > extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic > > > correctness”, mean a viable alternative? > > That said, several people in the W3C team agree with your position and > if you come up with a patch we'll be happy to review it great news: thanks to Cyrille we do have a patch for the CSS validator available that would throw a warning (“Property foo is an unknown vendor extension”) instead of an error when encountering vendor-specific extensions. What is the suggested/preferred process now to test and include this in the live version of the CSS validator? (The W3C might just contact Cyrille and me—j9t at google dot com—directly to coordinate.) Thank you, Jens. -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Friday, 31 December 2010 19:44:23 UTC