Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors

> Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific
> extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic
> correctness”, mean a viable alternative?

Would the validator team mind sharing its stance? I don’t believe this
needs to turn into a one-way centi-thread.

-- 
Jens O. Meiert
http://meiert.com/en/

Received on Sunday, 1 August 2010 04:47:34 UTC