On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Yves Lafon wrote: Argh sent instead of postponed... more inline. > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Michael Heuberger wrote: > >> Hello guy >> >> Sorry but something seems to be wrong with the CSS 2.1 Validator. >> >> The inline data is marked as invalid. But it's done properly regarding the >> CSS specification. For background images I am using >> url(... to reduce the number of requests. > > Try using url("..."); using separators triggers the "function(ident)" instead of URI. SOmething we indeed need to look at. Cheers, >> But the validator says following: >> - Value Error : background >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/colors.html#propdef-background> attempt to >> find a semi-colon before the property name. add it >> - Value Error : background >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/colors.html#propdef-background> Parse Error >> null >> - Property data doesn't exist : image/png >> >> Can you confirm me if this is a bug or not? >> >> Cheers >> >> Michael >> >> > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Thursday, 8 October 2009 11:52:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:01:05 UTC