Re: Contradictory validation reports

Dear Karl,

The error is not in the elccss.css file that you validated, but in your 
html source, where you have a form element with an invalid inline css 
style, caused by a new line break between border and -top.  Easily fixed.

Aslo, do you know that although your page looks fine in Firefox, it 
looks rubbish in Internet Explorer, where you appear to have what are 
probably float/clear problems.  If you need any help, just give me a 
shout via paulmckeown@chimneyrock.co.uk.

Cheers,
Paul McKeown.



Karl Limpert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I've been working on a new website recently, and continue to aspire to 
> keep it W3 compliant. However, while my CSS file is confirmed as valid 
> when I upload it from the PC, as soon as I host this for the site & 
> follow the CSS validation button, it declares an error. I've attached 
> PDF prints of both pages, but the CSS is the exact same, and simply 
> copied from the PC as soon as it is validated.
>
>  
>
> At the moment the CSS validation badge is on a page not indexed or 
> listed elsewhere (http://employmentlawclinic.com/ppma/searches/) 
> although this is only a temporary address while bugs are worked out , 
> so it may move soon. I'd like to keep the CSS badge, but would 
> appreciate understanding why my CSS is declared valid when submitted 
> from one address (the PC) while not from another (the hosting site).
>
>  
>
> Hope this is a bug with the Validation service, as I've worked hard to 
> try to keep to the standards, but would appreciate any feedback you 
> can offer.
>
>  
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
>  
>
> Kind regards,
>
>  
>
>  cid:image001.png@01C9D320.9FB010E0
>
>  
>
> Karl Limpert
>
> Consultant/Advocate
>
> Employment Law Clinic <http://employmentlawclinic.com/>
>
>  
>
> Phone: 020 3239 0569
>
>  
>
> This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
> views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
> necessarily represent those of Employment Law Clinic.
>
>  
>
> If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its 
> attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you 
> copy or show them to anyone.
>
>  
>
> Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
> in error.
>
>  
>
> This original of this email, and any attachments, has been scanned for 
> viruses before leaving Employment Law Clinic.
>
>  
>

Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 20:46:06 UTC