- From: Paul McKeown (Tiscali) <ppjmckeown@tiscali.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:41:30 +0100
- To: Karl Limpert <karl.limpert@employmentlawclinic.com>
- CC: www-validator-css@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BLU135-DAV7EBDB4648275DBFE2D6C391230@phx.gbl>
- Message-ID: <4A5CED7A.7050107@tiscali.co.uk>
Dear Karl, The error is not in the elccss.css file that you validated, but in your html source, where you have a form element with an invalid inline css style, caused by a new line break between border and -top. Easily fixed. Aslo, do you know that although your page looks fine in Firefox, it looks rubbish in Internet Explorer, where you appear to have what are probably float/clear problems. If you need any help, just give me a shout via paulmckeown@chimneyrock.co.uk. Cheers, Paul McKeown. Karl Limpert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been working on a new website recently, and continue to aspire to > keep it W3 compliant. However, while my CSS file is confirmed as valid > when I upload it from the PC, as soon as I host this for the site & > follow the CSS validation button, it declares an error. I've attached > PDF prints of both pages, but the CSS is the exact same, and simply > copied from the PC as soon as it is validated. > > > > At the moment the CSS validation badge is on a page not indexed or > listed elsewhere (http://employmentlawclinic.com/ppma/searches/) > although this is only a temporary address while bugs are worked out , > so it may move soon. I'd like to keep the CSS badge, but would > appreciate understanding why my CSS is declared valid when submitted > from one address (the PC) while not from another (the hosting site). > > > > Hope this is a bug with the Validation service, as I've worked hard to > try to keep to the standards, but would appreciate any feedback you > can offer. > > > > I look forward to hearing from you. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > cid:image001.png@01C9D320.9FB010E0 > > > > Karl Limpert > > Consultant/Advocate > > Employment Law Clinic <http://employmentlawclinic.com/> > > > > Phone: 020 3239 0569 > > > > This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any > views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of Employment Law Clinic. > > > > If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its > attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you > copy or show them to anyone. > > > > Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email > in error. > > > > This original of this email, and any attachments, has been scanned for > viruses before leaving Employment Law Clinic. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 20:46:06 UTC