- From: James Hopkins <james@idreamincode.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:48:40 +0100
- To: Tsarma Tenzin <web@burki-scherer.ch>
- Cc: "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
> As Tiscali has written, I think too CSS validator is loosing its
> charm.
>
> I have defined in my css general classes like
>
> ..right {
> float : right;
> }
>
> ..left {
> float : left;
> }
>
> div {
> width : 400px;
> }
>
> and now i have in my HTML a div with class right . I am doing this
> coz. I don't want CMS putting inline styles in my HTML tag, and
> instead they can put a class.
>
> And the joke is following don't give you the false warning.
>
> ..right {
> float : right;
> width : auto;
> }
>
> ..left {
> float : left;
> width : auto;
> }
>
> But then why we have to write width : auto, when all element has by
> default width auto!!
It's a syntax validator, and it doesn't attempt to interpret the
cascade in any way.
> Isn't it after all 'Casscading' style sheet ? You define width
> there, color here and get both width and colored box :-)
>
> Thanks
> Tenzin Tsarma
>
> <afa_sml-08-AAplus.gif>
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 07:49:22 UTC