- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:38:50 +0100
- To: "Paul McKeown (Tiscali)" <ppjmckeown@tiscali.co.uk>
- CC: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Paul McKeown (Tiscali) wrote: > I agree that the validator should be concerned only with the relevant > specifications. > > So why the reluctance to correct it in line with the spec for CSS 2.1? As I previously explained, I am not in the least reluctant, and my contribution was intended solely to facilitate the correction, not to oppose it in any way. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:39:35 UTC