- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:01:49 +0100
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- CC: "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Agreed, but I /think/ we agreed in the previous iteration of this discussion that it should be informational rather than a warning /qua/ warning, did we not ? Philip TAYLOR -------- David Dorward wrote: > Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote: >> The validator's sole purpose is to flag what is, and what is >> not, conformant, and specifically /not/ to flag >> what might cause problems in one or more browsers. > Warnings tend to cover issues of best practice and potential problems > rather than conformance issues (which should be errors). >
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:02:37 UTC