- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:04:55 +0100
- To: Dave Rado <dave.rado@mvps.org>
- Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
On 12 May 2008, at 17:40, Dave Rado wrote: > Please could you reclassify overflow-y as a "warning" rather than > classifying it as an error? As you point out in your own "error" > message, it is valid CSS3. ... but not valid CSS 2.1 If you want to use CSS 3, why not tell the validator to use the CSS 3 profile? http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?text=c{overflow-y %3Aauto}&profile=css3 > Furthermore, with the sole exception of Opera, all modern browsers > have supported it for several version (IE has supported it since > version 5.0), and those browsers that don't support it simply ignore > it, so it doesn't cause them any problems. It should really have > been handled via an addendum for CSS2 That would be something to take up with the CSS Working Group rather then the people who work on QA tools. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 09:05:55 UTC