- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:04:55 +0100
- To: Dave Rado <dave.rado@mvps.org>
- Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
On 12 May 2008, at 17:40, Dave Rado wrote:
> Please could you reclassify overflow-y as a "warning" rather than
> classifying it as an error? As you point out in your own "error"
> message, it is valid CSS3.
... but not valid CSS 2.1
If you want to use CSS 3, why not tell the validator to use the CSS 3
profile?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?text=c{overflow-y
%3Aauto}&profile=css3
> Furthermore, with the sole exception of Opera, all modern browsers
> have supported it for several version (IE has supported it since
> version 5.0), and those browsers that don't support it simply ignore
> it, so it doesn't cause them any problems. It should really have
> been handled via an addendum for CSS2
That would be something to take up with the CSS Working Group rather
then the people who work on QA tools.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 09:05:55 UTC