- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 19:39:44 +0900
- To: Felix Miata <mrmazda@ij.net>
- Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
Hello Felix, Thank you for the patch. With my apologies for taking a bit of time to review it, I have looked into it today. On 26-Mar-08, at 4:08 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > --- results0.css 2008-03-12 10:26:10.000000000 -0400 > +++ results1.css 2008-03-25 14:53:40.000000000 -0400 > @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ > img.inline-badge { > float: left; > padding: 10px; > - margin-left: 3em; > + margin-left: 1.6em; > } > > pre.badgeSnippet { > - margin-left: 108px !important; /* give room to the image */ > - padding-left: 3em; > - font-size: x-small; > - color: #777; > + margin-left: .6em !important; /* give room to the image */ > + padding-left: .6em; > + font-size: small; > + color: #000; > margin-bottom: 2em; > } > > @@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ > > /* ==== example of code for icon ==== */ > pre { > - margin-left: 30px; > - padding: 2em; > - border-left: thin solid #ddd; > + margin-left: 3px; > + padding: 2em .2em 1em; > + background-color: #e8f0ed; > } I have followed parts of your patch very closely (e.g font size), others I respectfully disagree with (making the text color stronger than the rest of the text on the results page, for instance) and therefore settled for a compromise patch that I hope you will find acceptable. The style patch can be tested at: http://qa-dev.w3.org:8001/css-validator/ It would be great if this change to the results page could be tested on a variety of browsers. Indeed, reports on any style bug currently showing would be much welcome. Thank you -- olivier Many thanks for your feedback and contribution.
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 10:40:31 UTC