- From: Thomas Auge <auge@virtues.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:41:05 +0200
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
- CC: Jens Brueckmann <jens.brueckmann@gmail.com>
Hello Jens, > Actually you have quite a few warnings about background and text > colours. The reason for these warnings is, that user Style sheets may > render your page unreadable, if not both background and text colours > are set. I fixed those and tested them. It seems the validator has a slight bug there. Amazingly enough it did recognize the background areas placed through positioning correctly. However, it did not recognize all areas positioned over other areas, which did have a background defined. This might be asking a bit much though. ;-) A real bug is the validator complaining about "body" and ".footer table" having the same background. ".footer" does have a background color defined, and unless I am missing something ".footer table" can only appear in the ".footer" context, which has the correct background. This might need fixing. Another minor thing is that I am getting warnings about the same background and border color for some input fields. The border style is outset or inset for those, which causes the browser to actually lighten or darken the border color and the background color is often a good choice for that border type. The validator should probably check for border type "solid" before reporting these warnings. Run http://www.kiss-chance.net (might be NWS, should be ok without images) through the validator - it will show some background errors. Then load the page without images. All text is readable (with the exception of some alt tags overlapping). Just an FYI, not really a serious issue. :-) Thomas ----------------------- http://www.augemedia.de
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 13:41:25 UTC