- From: Michael Davey <michael@cytringan.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:16:24 +0100
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- CC: www-validator-css@w3.org
Oliver, Many thanks for the info, and especially the link to the in-dev validator.. olivier Thereaux wrote: > CSS2.1 only includes properties that were implemented. In other words, > if font-stretch: wider is not in CSS2.1, there is not much point, > right now, in using it. I gather that the CSS Working Group (in charge > of CSS standardization) expects to bring it back, and have it properly > implemented, for CSS3. > >> If the former, it would be nice if the validator included a warning >> to say that the same is valid in 2.0 and 3.0 > > Ta-da: > http://qa-dev.w3.org:8001/css-validator/ > (still in development) > >> and give information about how to hint to browsers that one is using >> CSS 2.0 or CSS 3.0. > > Versioning in CSS is controversial… The CSS WG is preparing a document > explaining its vision of CSS as one whole, with different profiles, > not versions. I hope it will be made public very soon: when it does, > and if it can provide a number of clarifications, including what to do > with discrepancies between CSS1 and CSS2 core syntax, the CSS > validator will be updated to reflect this (as you can see on the > qa-dev instance) > > Regards,
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 08:19:01 UTC