- From: Cecil Ward <cecil@cecilward.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:41:55 +0100
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Olivier wrote:
> The original bug report is correct, that relative URIs should not be dereferenced when using file upload or direct input.
Thank you for that, Olivier. Aside from the case of @import, there is a more general issue with URLs.
What should happen about validating the syntax of a URL itself? Should the CSS validator attempt this? Is it acceptable to say that a CSS file is "valid" if URLs that it contains are ill-formed? Or should this need to be devolved to another component?
For instance, I notice that the validator allows all sorts of strange things in other cases where a URI is accepted, such as
* { background-image: url(" ") }
or
* { background-image: url("::::::") }
Cecil Ward.
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 09:42:10 UTC