- From: Cyber Dog <cyberdog3k@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:00:58 -0500
- To: "Peter Normann" <peter@normann.com>
- Cc: "CSS validator list" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
On 2/23/06, Peter Normann <peter@normann.com> wrote: > > I would agree that the wording needs to be considered. While most learned > developers, members of this mailing list and your truly are aware that the > warning can safely be disregarded, I will think twice before advertising CSS > conformance to the rest of the world, clients or prospective clients. > > I care about code quality and I care about conformance to any relevant > standard (or in this case recommandation) where as most people do not. > > I would like to signal that I actually make an effort doing what I do, but I > am unsure how the net effect will be at the other end if the validation > report is plastered with warnings. > > "Jeez, there's a bunch of warnings. Doesn't this guy ever check his work? > Maybe we'll call somebody else next time." > > Also, if warnings are too generously generated you risk having warnings be > disregarded in general over time at the expense of the few interesting ones. > > When I validate my CSS I am not particularly interested in a design review. > I am interested in learning whether a somewhat compliant browser would have > any idea what I am trying to accomplish. > Very well said. For what it's worth, I agree fully.
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 07:01:04 UTC