- From: Burtin Hart <beh@atac.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:35:36 -0700
- To: "'David Dorward'" <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Thank you.
Obviously the statement needs to be amended to inform the reader that it is
merely a note about what's a "best practice."
Burtin
-----Original Message-----
From: David Dorward [mailto:david@dorward.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:28 AM
To: Burtin Hart
Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
Subject: RE: RE: Comment/question about HTML validator response...
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:10 -0700, Burtin Hart wrote:
> No error or warning found
> To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document
> parse tree. This means you should use valid HTML.
It means exactly what it says - you should use valid HTML.
> I also tested my HTML and got no errors or warnings (image attached).
It *doesn't* say that you HTML is not valid. Just that you should check that
it isn't.
--
David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
-- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:39:30 UTC