- From: Cyber Dog <cyberdog3k@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:58:18 -0500
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
- Cc: Aaron Gyes <floam@sh.nu>
On 11/6/05, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Cyber Dog wrote: > > > The short answer is, even though 'transparent' is valid css, the > > validator has been made to complain about it because a couple people > > feel its bad style to use it rather than a set color. > > Roughly so; but > - read "valid" as "formally correct" > - read "complain" as "warn" > - read "feel" as "know" > - read "bad style" as "risky" > > -- > Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/ > You do realize you've been outvoted on this issue by everyone to visit the list since we first debated it, don't you?
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 14:58:25 UTC