- From: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:18:04 +0100
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> So is using proprietary extensions in a way specified e.g. in CSS 2.1 >> making the stylesheet an invalid CSS stylesheet? Or is it merely making >> it just an invalid CSS 2.1 (or CSS 3, 1, 42) stylesheet? > >They will always be invalid. Properties starting with such prefixes are >just known not to be reused by the CSS WG/W3C so they can safely be used >to experiment without causing problems in the future. I'm sorry, I mixed up "parse-able" and "valid". I'm suggesting a CSS Validator profile that only reports parsing errors, but does not validate against a certain CSS revision. Secondly, I'm suggesting an additional switch to validate against a certain CSS profile, and copy extension properties verbatim to the output, giving (at most) a warning on it, but no error. This would enhance its usability during private experimental stages. Regards, Christian. -- Please don't CC list answers to my own email address. I actually read the lists I post to.
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 12:18:11 UTC