- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:53:30 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: "[BTK]-denbuzze" <vueringschristian@gmail.com>, www-validator-css@w3.org
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, David Dorward wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:38:06PM +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, David Dorward wrote: > > > CSS doesn't currently provide a way to implement opacity, > > > > Actually, it does: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency > > Which I didn't mention since it is not yet a recommendation It's in CR. That's as far as it can get along the W3C track until it gets a decent test suite and two compliant implementations. (It's as far as CSS1, CSS2, CSS2.1, HTML4, etc, have reached.) > nor does it have wide support among user agents (and the sole user agent > being targeted by the non-standard code is not among those user agents > which do support it.) It's supported by Mozilla and Safari, I believe. You didn't say "IE doesn't provide a standard way of doing it", you said "CSS doesn't currently provide a way to implement opacity". That's untrue, and is all I was correcting. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 12:53:39 UTC