- From: Carole <caroleanne@designs.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:20:39 -0700
- To: "Rowne-Wuff Mastaile" <wuffxiii@gmail.com>, www-validator-css@w3.org
Hmmmm. I don't see a problem. Your CSS validates. The validator does make a couple *suggestions*. One is that you add a generic font to your font-family. This is referring to the font-family listing "impact" - no generic as you did for the "Arial" font-family. The second is referencing "opacity". The CSS version being used is CSS version 2 and "opacity" is not a valid property for this version. With regard to the <snip> <space>:<space> rubbish or any of the other nonsense that had > magically worked its way in, that is how the validator reproduces your > code. It isn't rubbish, either. It is perfectly valid as written. HTH, Carole > > Yet on validation, there are errors there which don't even exist in > the source file. So I uploaded from a local file and there are errors > there that don't even exist in the file I uploaded from. > > Please, check for yourself. > > Use http://jigsaw.w3.org/ to validate > http://katbox.net/stylesheets/fx.css. Compare the source file with > the results. Look at the mess that is the results, it's not even my > code. Could anyone tell me what's going on there? > > I know the bug reports are going to flow in soon... as people > foolhardily report errors in my CSS that don't even exist. <.< > -- Owner, Carole Anne Designs Member Seattle Fashion Core Member International Webmasters Association/HTML Writers Guild Support the Web Accessibility Initiative: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ and the Web Standards Project: http://www.webstandards.org/ Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 05:23:32 UTC