- From: Dave Shea <dave@mezzoblue.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:55:13 -0800
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
Hello,
A few observances I've discussed with various people over the past few
days. It seems the CSS validator is acting oddly under certain
circumstances.
Consider the following snippet:
p { font: bold italic large Palatino, serif }
If you validate through textarea, it passes, but the results listing
reverses the order of 'bold' and 'italic'. I could potentially see this
as a result of parsing, but it's a bit disconcerting.
Now consider this example:
p { font: normal italic 12pt georgia, serif; }
Valid, but it results in an error. It appears it's reading 'italic' to
be the font size, which must mean it's assuming 'normal' is a property
other than font-weight in this case. Once again I could probably see
this being a parsing error, since (taken from:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/fonts.html#propdef-font) the following:
[ <'font-style'> || <'font-variant'> || <'font-weight'> ]
would indicate that it's possible to write a rule like "font: normal
italic normal georgia, serif;". But regardless, it's still valid CSS
which isn't being reported as such.
Next and last example, taken from
http://css.researchkitchen.de/validation.html:
div { border: 1px solid c85; }
Passes as valid, though the color value is clearly invalid. More
thoughts and an interesting observation:
http://www.minzweb.de/en/pages/sitetopics/archive_permalink.asp?id=42
d.
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 13:04:05 UTC