- From: Texas Crazy <howdy@texascrazy.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:41:04 -0500
- To: <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Hi, I appreciate having the online CSS validator ( http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ ) to check my style sheets. When I ran the validator a "warning came up with a message that is confusing and may be taken in two opposing ways: a.. Line : 0 font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last alternative Does this message mean "always ADD a font-family to every text related option"? Also in US English we sometimes say "that's the last thing I would do", which is really a way to say I would never do it, even if there were only three options. So I would change the warning readout to avoid the misunderstanding. Secondly and more importantly, since I am now a bit confused by the warning readout, I would suggest a related "details" hyperlink be placed inline in the warning section by each error message that explains in more detail and gives a sample (side-by-side if possible) of the right and wrong way to code this issue. Yes, I can go back to the larger body of CSS documentation listed on W3 to figure out font-family guidelines and search around to find the answer, but why when a hyperlink can do the searching for me? Thanks for all your great work! Regards, Bill ______________________________ Bill Ellmore Texas Crazy http://www.texascrazy.com We help you celebrate Texas!
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 18:47:38 UTC