- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 10:46:08 -0500 (EST)
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org, www-validator-css@w3.org
At 15:53 +0200 2002-04-04, Terje Bless wrote: >Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > >>I have found something, maybe already known, The HTML validator and the >>CSS validator can't detect this file is wrong : >> >>http://www.la-grange.net/2002/04/03-styleatt-wo-meta >> >>This file has a style attribute style="color: green; border: solid red;" >>but no metaname specifying the default stylesheet language. So by >>definition, the file is not a valid one : > >And, regrettably, we cannot check for this. This is another one of those >limitations that exist only in the prose and cannot be expressed in a >Document Type Declaration. I'm not even sure you can coerce a XML Schema I agree with you... but it's a warning of the HTML 4.01 recommandation. In http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/intro/sgmltut.html#h-3.1 3. A specification that describes the semantics to be ascribed to the markup. This specification also imposes syntax restrictions that cannot be expressed within the DTD. I think we should try to identify in the recommandations the things which are not expressed in terms of a DTD but that the recommandation says it's correct or not. And so we may establish mechanism to identify and detect those problems. argg ;) more things to do. >Processor to check for this. Any form of "lint" -- as possibly the CSS >Validator can be said to be -- should be able to do it though. It would >aslo be a good check to implement for third party tools, such as editors >and publishing systems, to implement. Yes you're right. CSS validator should detect that error too. -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 16:43:41 UTC