- From: Klaus Birkenbihl <Klaus.Birkenbihl@w3c.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:29:01 +0200
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
- Cc: Klaus Birkenbihl <Klaus.Birkenbihl@w3c.de>
Dear all, I didn' intent to send the original mail to the list. I simply clicked "Philippe Le Hégaret & Sijtsche de Jong" at the bottom of the validator page and reached the list. OK, here we go on: >At 20:26 26.06.01 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Klaus Birkenbihl wrote: >>Hi Philippe, >> >>you offer to include >> >><p> <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/"> <img style="border:0;width:88px;height:31px" src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"> </a> </p> >> >>into CSS validated docs. Unfortunately this is not valid XHTML. >>(Missing end tag for <img>) > >Yes, and if there was <img /> it wouldn't fit for HTML documents. You >are suggesting to propose different code samples for XHTML and HTML >documents? I do not stick to an implementation my first concern is that the user is not trapped by the following sequence: * user calls CSS validation * CSS validation says "hey go and validate your html first" * user calls html validation * validator says "great your doc is correct XHTML" * user copies the "xhtml" validator logo into his document * user calls CSS validation * CSS says "great" * user copies CSS validator logo into his document * user publishes his document customer calls users page: * customer states: user claims to send valid xhtml * customer clicks the xhtml validator logo to check ... Implementations: a) a bold disclaimer "don't use this without modification for XHTML" might work - but is not very friendly to XHTML users b) different code samples would be easy and moderately friendly c) if a doctype can be found a customized code sample would be luxorious But since "c)" would still need "b)" for stand alone CSS-Files "b)" might be appropriate. This would also allow to conform to coding suggestions of the standard: (HTML tag should be upper case XHTML must be lower case). Meanwhile the English version is conformant (only) to XHTML while the German version supports (only) HTML. A bit more confusing ... Best regards, Klaus Btw. The CSS Validator (German Version) cannot verify itself: Error Target: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.html Please, validate your XML document first! Line 29 Column 17 An invalid XML character (Unicode: 0xfc) was found in the element content of the document. Klaus Birkenbihl W3C Deutsches Büro mailto:Klaus.Birkenbihl@w3c.de http://www.w3c.de
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2001 11:28:55 UTC