RE: New "tv:" URI draft

OK, I thought I'd try one more time before sending this off to the IESG.
Are there any further comments on the "tv:" URI draft, or do we have
something approaching consensus on this approach?

	Dan


--------------------------------------------------- 
Dan Zigmond 
Senior Manager, Interactive Television Technologies 
WebTV Networks, Inc. 
djz@corp.webtv.net 
--------------------------------------------------- 


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Zigmond [mailto:djz@corp.webtv.net]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 11:00 AM
To: 'www-tv@w3.org'
Subject: RE: New "tv:" URI draft


I just wanted to double check and see if those of you on the list have had a
chance to review this.  I've received only one set of comments (very helpful
ones), but want to be sure to collect any others before sending this revised
draft off to the IETF/IESG.  Also, I haven't heard anything on the "lid:"
draft yet.

Please do let me (and, preferably, the list) know what you think.

	Dan


--------------------------------------------------- 
Dan Zigmond 
Senior Manager, Broadcast Applications 
WebTV Networks, Inc. 
djz@corp.webtv.net 
--------------------------------------------------- 



-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Zigmond [mailto:djz@corp.webtv.net]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 3:44 PM
To: 'www-tv@w3.org'
Subject: New "tv:" URI draft


I apologize for the long delay, but here is the revised "tv:" draft.  It
incorporates the various changes we've discussed on this list, particularly
the change from conventional television network identifiers like "BBC" and
"KQED" to domain names like "bbc.co.uk" and "kqed.org".  Hopefully, this
accurately reflects the general consensus, and we can send it on to the
IESG.

Thanks for all the input I've received so far, and please send any
additional comments to me and/or to this list.

	Dan
 <<tv-uri.doc>> 

--------------------------------------------------- 
Dan Zigmond 
Senior Manager, Broadcast Applications 
WebTV Networks, Inc. 
djz@corp.webtv.net 
---------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2000 20:09:41 UTC