- From: Craig A. Finseth <fin@finseth.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:18:38 -0600 (CST)
- To: tenkate@natlab.research.philips.com
- Cc: gomer@lgerca.com, www-tv@w3.org, e-e@toocan.philabs.research.philips.com
... Gomer Thomas wrote: > > I worry that we will come up with an excellent scheme which meets all > needs for DTV, but objections will be raised that it does not meet this > requirement, So, maybe it is not that excellent :) It might be excellent with respect to the requirements you are concerned about. ... Maybe we didn't define our scope that precisely, and we all assume our own vision is the correct one. So, let's check that. ... Storing TV Broadcast content after transmission is not something I find tangentially related. The Internet is neither. After all, I thought that was the reason to instantiate this Interest Group. It is also a driving reason why we are thinking of using URI in TV Broadcast at all. Perhaps if we changed the requirement to read: o A URI should be resolvable under any of the following network access conditions: - TV Broadcast, same or another network - Internet > - Home/local storage and playback of TV broadcast content < - Other (future) networks ? This permits common operations without expanding the scope too much. Craig
Received on Monday, 23 November 1998 11:18:40 UTC