- From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 15:16:55 -0700
- To: "'Philipp Hoschka'" <ph@w3.org>, www-tv@w3.org
I think the appropriate thing is to review/coordinate with other W3C groups (especially the HTML group) and I would like to participate in that process. While I think it would be appropriate to review any ATSC approved spec that comes out of DASE, I don't think that should mean any endorsement of any of the current conflicting proposals in DASE - and BHTML is just one of those proposals. It's one that I believe conflicts with and duplicates work already being done in the W3C in other groups. I don't think our group should grant the BHTML proposal any special status. > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, October 09, 1998 1:12 PM > To: www-tv@w3.org > Subject: Getting started > > > > In the immediate future, we need to address the following > discussion items from > > http://www.w3.org/TV/TVWeb > > 1) Document on TV-specific requirements on CSS > 2) Document on "tv" URL-scheme > > The page already lists a number of people that have > expressed interest to do the work required here. > It also lists the current status that I'm aware of, e.g. > which documents already exist. > > To get started, I guess the best way to procede is > for one or more of the people listed as "workers" for > each topic to come up with strawman proposal(s) on these > topics, and send them to this list. To distinguish between > the two topics, please put "URL:" or "CSS:" at the beginning > of the subject line. > > The page also lists a discussion item on a "Document on > TV-specific requirements on HTML". My feeling is that > this has been a bit overtaken by events since the IG proposal > was written, since different groups have already started to work on > this (see page for details) > > If there are no objections, I would thus like to change > this work item into reviewing eventual working > drafts coming out of these groups on whether they meet the > TV-specific requirements they claim to address, > rather than writing our own requirements document. > However, I'm open to suggestions. > > -Philipp Hoschka, W3C > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Philipp Hoschka | > http://www.w3.org/people/hoschka | > | World Wide Web Consortium > | MIT-LCS > ph@w3.org | 545, Technology Square > Tel:(+1) 617.258.0604 | Cambridge, MA 02139 > Fax:(+1) 617.258.5999 | USA > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >
Received on Friday, 9 October 1998 18:17:22 UTC