- From: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:22:08 -0800
- To: www-tt-tf@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
> >>I think there are several possibilities, some which this point might >>>be trying to say: >>> >>>a) there will be an XML representation of the timed text format (since >>> markup is mentioned, this is pretty much a given) >>>b) the XML will be well formed (otherwise it is not XML) >>>c) the XML will be valid to a DTD >>>d) the XML will be valid to a W3C XML Schema >>>e) the XML will meet some other validity constraint mentioned in the >>> prose of the specification >>>f) XML will be the only representation of this format >>>g) XML will be the canonical representation of this format, but >>> transcoding to binary XML representations is allowed for particular >>> devices >>>h) there will be a single defined binary representation as well as the >>> XML representation >>>i) there will be many representations, XML is just an example >>> >>>My recommendation would be to select a, b, d, g and consider h and avoid i > >DS> This is a nice analysis and seems like an excellent start. > >To clarify - does that mean that you agree with my recommendation, or >that you agree that this is the list and have a different preference >(in which case, what is it?) > Right now I agree, but I am open to persuasion otherwise (as indeed is usually true on a collaborative approach). -- David Singer Apple Computer/QuickTime
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 13:23:20 UTC