- From: Cohen, Aaron M <aaron.m.cohen@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:41:33 -0800
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, Rob Lanphier <robla@real.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, www-tt-tf@w3.org
It appears likely that a TT language can be developed that uses modules from XHTML, SMIL, and SVG, and is also a lot simpler than XHTML Basic+SMIL Basic. As I understand it, not being compliant with XHTML Basic just means that we can't call the language XHTML (probably not a problem in this case), we can still use some of the modules. For that matter, the language will likely wind up not meeting the requirements for SMIL hostlanguage or SMIL integration set conformance - but we can still use the basic timing markup modules. To me, this winds up being a pretty good reason for defining a TT language spec, even given the requirement that we use as much pre-existing markup (in the form of modules) as possible. Right now, there is no specification that integrates the appropriate modules together into a document type. Since the document type will likely be related to, but distinct from XHTML, SMIL, and SVG, we'll have to create our own. -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:21 AM To: Rob Lanphier Cc: Ivan Herman; www-tt-tf@w3.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Timed Text work Well, it is possible that we want a couple of modules. The normal use case is and going to use a handful of text elements, some styling and positioning (we have a couple of ways of doing that), and timing/synchronisation. If modularising XHTML and SMIL and maybe SVG together into profiles turns out to be the best way to go, it should be simple to build a richer featured version with things that provide for interactivity, etc. cheers Chaals On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Rob Lanphier wrote: Whatever we come up with needs to be *way* simpler than XHTML Basic+SMIL. There's no need for forms, images, tables, SMIL hierarchical layout, etc, etc. I would hope the end result looks a lot more like a stripped down version of SVG. Rob On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Ivan Herman wrote: > > >Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 05:57:07 -0500 (EST) > >From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> > >Reply-To: danield@w3.org > >To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> > >cc: w3t-tech@w3.org > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:56:58 +0100 > >Subject: Re: Timed Text work > > > > > > > Thanks. My personal feeling is that XHTMLBasic + SMIL should do it (SMIL > > > has some positioning facilities, too), but we can leave that to the WG. > > > > > > Not that I want to get on anybody's nerve, but I still go on nagging... My > > > reaction is purely (as usual) the comm team person reaction: how would I > > > present this stuff to the public? Not only should we try to reuse existing > > > modules, but we should also try to avoid adding too much to the acronym > > > soup if we can avoid. If we spend a lot of time to the general public to > > > explain what SMIL and XHTML are, let use those combinations explicitly, > > > rather than having TT... Also, wouldn't it be clearer to have a slightly > > > more general charter for a WG and let that one finalize the XHTML+SMIL > > > module, too? The similarities are really too close... > > > >All good questions that should be discussed in the TT-TF forum. > > Ivan Herman > > Head of Offices, World Wide Web Consortium > C/o W3C Dutch Office at CWI, Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam > tel: +31-20-5924163 > fax: +31-20-5924312 > mobile: +33-608872517 > email: ivan@w3.org > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 13:41:52 UTC