W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > September to October 2014

Re: Suggestion: aax - Ajax Without Javascript

From: softwatt <softwatt@gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:38:34 +0300
Message-ID: <5427E52A.40305@gmx.com>
To: lee@leegoddard.net
CC: www-talk@w3.org
On 09/28/2014 01:31 PM, Lee Goddard wrote:
> 
> On 28/09/2014 11:26, softwatt wrote:
>> On 09/28/2014 01:20 PM, Lee Goddard wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2014 10:48, softwatt wrote:
>>>> Iframes are extremely limited  in comparison to this. Only a "box" can
>>>> be updated without any interaction whatsoever with the rest of the
>>>> document, appending is non existent, and long-polling is not
>>>> practical.
>>>>
>>> A native way to transclude markup to a node in the DOM, seems very much
>>> in the spirit of the times. I can't say the same for the way you
>>> specified attributes  seems to repeat the bungle seen in HTTP headers 
>>> and I'm not sure about the need for any other than a URI, but I watch
>>> with interest to see how this progresses.
>> Http headers are indeeed a mess. (Though I think one needs atleast
>> URI+Cookies).
>>
>> But Could you explain how this "seems to repeat the bungle seen in HTTP
>> headers"? Don't you think that the current AJAX is the actual bungle and
>> that this is a step towards simplicity?
>>
> Sorry  the bungle would be the way the attributes were specified as
> semi-colon-delimited strings, rather than true attributes.

Oh. Sorry for misinterpreting that. I don't really mind making them
separate.

A general question: Do suggestions posted on a humble mailing list ever
make it anywhere nowadays? If not, what additional steps would one need
to take in order to put an idea into practice?


Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:38:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:33 UTC