- From: softwatt <softwatt@gmx.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:26:19 +0300
- To: lee@leegoddard.net
- CC: www-talk@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:26:08 UTC
On 09/28/2014 01:20 PM, Lee Goddard wrote: > > On 28/09/2014 10:48, softwatt wrote: >> Iframes are extremely limited in comparison to this. Only a "box" can >> be updated without any interaction whatsoever with the rest of the >> document, appending is non existent, and long-polling is not >> practical. >> > > A native way to transclude markup to a node in the DOM, seems very much > in the spirit of the times. I can't say the same for the way you > specified attributes — seems to repeat the bungle seen in HTTP headers — > and I'm not sure about the need for any other than a URI, but I watch > with interest to see how this progresses. Http headers are indeeed a mess. (Though I think one needs atleast URI+Cookies). But Could you explain how this "seems to repeat the bungle seen in HTTP headers"? Don't you think that the current AJAX is the actual bungle and that this is a step towards simplicity?
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:26:08 UTC