- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 00:52:50 -0500
- To: "'Adrien de Croy'" <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: <www-talk@w3.org>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Adrien de Croy wrote: > if you wanted A to think the resource from C is really coming > from B, then B would need to proxy the request through to C, > and forward the response back through its connection. Thanks for the reply. That is what is critical to avoid. If TCP/IP can't do this jow does SIP do it? An alternate would be a reply that goes back to the client that says: "This URL is actually hosted at the URL in the 'Location:' field but don't update the URL line displayed to the URL as the URL you requested is really the official URL its just that for the moment we are keeping it over at the value in the Location field. Feel free to cache that new URL and associate it with the URL you requested until the 'Expires:' date/time at which point you should re-request." Essentially this would be like a 302 but where the temporary redirection is not made transparent to users. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 05:52:59 UTC