- From: A Bagi <ahmed.bagi@virgin.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:06:27 +0100
- To: "Greg Robson-Garth" <gregrg@optusnet.com.au>, <www-talk@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003101c464d3$3d6ff140$0301a8c0@sn023784320093>
Recipients of date values are encouraged to be robust in accepting date values that may have been sent by non-HTTP applications, as is sometimes the case when retrieving or posting messages via proxies/gateways to SMTP or NNTP. The presence of an Age header field in a response implies that a response is not first-hand. However, the converse is not true, since the lack of an Age header field in a response does not imply that the ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Robson-Garth To: www-talk@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:50 AM Subject: Meaning of header fields Date and Age: What do these fields mean. According to "the spec", RFC2616 the Date the date/time the message was generated at the origin server. 1. Date In a cache server, assuming the message is now resident in the cache and has been requested by a HTTP client. Should the cache server send with message with: a) the Date header as it received it from the origin server b) generate a new Date header being the date/time the message is sent from the cache and calculate the age as the residence time 2. Age Does the Age header represent the seconds relative to the date/time in the date header. So if the Age is say Age: 60 and the time is 03:00:00, then its birth time (for a want of a better word) is 02:59:00. If this is the case, then surely the correct calculation of corrected_received_age in 13.2.3 should be now - date_value + age_value Can anyone comment ? --Greg Author, FreeProxy
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 06:11:18 UTC