- From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:15:59 +0100
- To: "Etan Wexler" <ewexler@stickdog.com>, "www-talk" <www-talk@w3.org>
> Nigel Peck wrote to <mailto:www-style@w3.org> on 9 June 2003 in > "Re: WWW vs. > Internet" (<mid:BFECLKEDIHDIPFDEBCFNIEKJEMAA.nigel@miswebdesign.com>): > > > Personally I consider the Web to be only Web sites. > > What is a Web site? I'm not trying to be difficult; the question is in > earnest. Can an FTP repository be a Web site? After all, I can access the > FTP repository in the manner in which I access HTTP sites. I see what you're saying but I would call that part of the Internet (FTP) but not part of the Web. > > I was using TCP/IP as the name for the Protocol suite as a > whole (as most > > people/everyone except you does?). > > I thought that TCP/IP was used only to mean the Transport Control Protocol > running over the Internet Protocol. Your phrasing, "TCP/IP based", would > seem to include the two mentioned protocols and any protocols running over > TCP. I admit that I'm not familiar with the proper use of the jargon. I've always used TCP/IP as the name for the suit as a whole. > > Would you have preferred me to say: > > > > The world wide ip, icmp, ggp, tcp, egp, pup, udp, hmp, xns-idp, > rdp, rvd based > > network and all the tens of thousands of services being run across it? > > No, I prefer a concise definition more than a correct or complete one. So what name would you use to refer to the suite of protocols used on the net? > Speaking of which: > > >> Well, I was hoping for the emergence of what I call useful > lies, but the > >> definitions so far are too misleading to qualify. > > > > Please explain. > > Useful lies are explanations or definitions that are not correct, > yet which > help people to understand or to function. Correcting a useful lie requires > many details and is therefore avoided most of the time. > > I considered your definition of the World Wide Web misleading because the > definition did not include HTTP clients, let alone non-HTTP services. Fair enough, just a difference of opinion. > > And in answer to the question? Are the terms "World Wide Web" > and "Internet" > > now synonymous? > > The terms are not synonymous. I hope that, on www-talk, there is agreement > on this point. Me too. What's you definition of the Web then? And how does it differ from the Internet? Cheers, Nigel MIS Web Design http://www.miswebdesign.com/
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 07:16:54 UTC