- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:43:20 -0800
- To: "Justin Chapweske" <justin@chapweske.com>
- Cc: "S. Mike Dierken" <mdierken@hotmail.com>, <www-talk@w3.org>
> I also think it might be interesting to push this concept further and > describe higher level constructs with the RDF. I'm very interested in > showing some relationship between ETag and Content-MD5 as identifiers. > There is also a (maybe weak) relationship between Content-MD5 and > Content-Length in that both can be used to verify a piece of content. Agreed. > The below RDF is definately on the right track. One bit of feedback > that I have is that while specifying type is very useful, it should also > be possible to convert the RDF back into HTTP headers without too much > trouble. Agreed. > While I don't have time right now to really dive into this stuff, I'm > very interested in hearing others thoughts on the topic. Hopefully in > the next couple of months I'll have some time to really play around with > this. I'm pretty much in the same boat. Please tell me if you make any progress, and I'll do likewise!
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 00:43:38 UTC