- From: Justin Chapweske <justin@chapweske.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:08:28 -0600
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, www-talk@w3.org
> > RDF was supposed to address these things. I think it's the right approach, > because you need a general model for metadata, multiple ways to express it > (in XML, in HTTP headers, etc.), and a way to combine metadata from > multiple sources to come up with a definitive view of the world. > Unfortunately, it has moved on to grander schemes before solving these > simple problems. > Mark, I agree with most of your statements, but I might suggest that another way to look at the problem is as a URI resolution problem. Rather than trying to describe a "mirror" for a link, I think a more consistent approach is to provide pointers to a URI resolver for that link. In the Content-Addressable Web, we use the THTTP resolvers specified in RFC 2169 to do things like: I2N - From a given URI, discover a URN. So we take http://foo.com/bigfile.tgz and discover urn:sha1:ASDLFKJWEROI23U4OKASJDFLAKSJFD I2Ls - From a given URI, discover alternate URLs. So we take the above 'urn:sha1:ASDLFKJWEROI23U4OKASJDFLAKSJFD' and discover a list of URLs that mirror the data specified by that URN. Thus, I think it would be very useful to use RDF to describe URI resolution services, as well as serializing equivilence relationships between URIs. > BTW, we ran into problems very similar to these with metadata at Akamai; > one of the outcomes of that was URISpace > (http://www.w3.org/TR/urispace.html). It's probably too heavyweight for > your particular project, but you might find it interesting. I've been > thinking of expressing entire Web site configurations (Apache .conf files, > P3P.xml, robots info, etc.) in URISpace, and then writing a transform to > create the appropriate configuration files from one source. Anybody > interested? Very nice. This solves a problem that I was beating my head against for describing a given resolver service as pertaining to a set of URIs. Could you briefly describe the differences/similarities between this and XPath??? Thanks, -- Justin Chapweske, Onion Networks http://onionnetworks.com/
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2003 13:08:30 UTC