- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 12:58:41 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, www-talk@w3.org
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:47:00PM +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: > At 03:43 PM 5/23/02 +0100, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > >The RDF Core WG would certainly want the SW and WWW to be > >interoperable, and yet after repeated debates spurred mainly by Aaron, > >fragIDs in RDF haven't been deprecated. That speaks volumes. > > As one who used to think that fragids in RDF were broken... > > I've been thinking about this point some, and I'm coming round to a view > that fragid's are not only OK with RDF, but their use is to be preferred > for many RDF resources, and that the SW/WWW integration can work just > fine. I've not yet had time to sit down and straighten my thoughts ... too > many other things to do! Process foul! 8-) You can't do that. We need reasons, damnit! MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 12:50:11 UTC