- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:24:40 -0700
- To: "'Www-Talk@W3. Org'" <www-talk@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-talk-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-talk-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of Mark Baker > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:04 PM > To: Anne Thomas Manes > Cc: Simon St.Laurent; Www-Talk@W3. Org > Subject: Relocating Web services > <snip/> > I'd be all for this. I would also expect that the fees we'd lose with > members leaving would be less than the cost for running the > Web Services > Activity. So I consider that a good thing. Plus, they'll be back, if > they don't go out of business first. 8-) > Good thing only a tiny number of member companies have this reckless and irresponsible attitude, though they certainly try to make up for numbers with volume. And after a bit of time and hard work, it is now it is public record the full extent of the desire of a few inside and outside the W3C to circumvent and over-ride W3C Process and the membership's publicly stated goals. Cheers, Dave
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 01:28:05 UTC