- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 14:58:35 +0100
- To: "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>, <www-talk@w3.org>
> Exclusions don't exist in XML, so nested A elements are > unfortunately valid XHTML. You can't blame XML for that - it's down to the crappy schema languages we have to use. If we could use TREX/Schematron etc. (?) I guess we would be able to constrain that any inline element in an anchor cannot have an anchor within itself. > XHTML is the beginning of the migration towards > namespaces, What's wrong with that? Givng a document a globally unique and certifiable (not always) name - quite useful for uniqueness, one day useful for validation, and certainly useful on the SW. > Any document on the web should be signable, Agreed. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2001 09:59:32 UTC