W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2001

Re: Signing Document and PICS

From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.32.0104061724070.2907-100000@paddington>
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> At 02:28 PM 4/6/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >Which may answer some questions. If your document is an XHTML page, then you
> >can stick it in since it is safely in another namespace.
> Huh?  XHTML doesn't permit simply "sticking in" content which "is safely in
> another namespace".
> Given the addition of another module which defines the dropped-in content
> (like RDDL does for its components), it's fine, but namespaces don't make
> anything happen 'safely' by themselves.

Section 7.7 of the RDF specfication says to drop RDF in the head of an
HTML document. <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/>

I don't get it, the result isn't HTML.  Why would the recommend such a
thing.  It makes me feel sick to my stomach.

- -- 
Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

Received on Friday, 6 April 2001 20:25:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:25 UTC