Re: C++?

Jean-Francois Groff (jfgroff@munchkin.next.com)
Tue, 15 Dec 92 00:20:45 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "comp.infosystems.www"
Previous message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: two ideas...."
Maybe in reply to: Marc Andreessen: "C++?"

Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 00:20:45 +0100
From: jfgroff@munchkin.next.com (Jean-Francois Groff)
Message-Id: <9212142320.AA02789@prospero>
To: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: C++? 

Marc proposes:
>> What if I went away and came back in four or six months with a
>> completely object-oriented C++ implementation of the base WWW code?
>> I.e., classes for Document, Anchor, et al, with enough hooks to
>> support a hell of a lot of browsers.

and Dan notes:
> I looked over the HText, HT_Anchor, etc. stuff a while ago.
> The design is sound, I think. It would convert quite nicely
> to C++.

Let me add that HText, HTAnchor etc. were originally designed in Objective-C

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "comp.infosystems.www"
Previous message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: two ideas...."
Maybe in reply to: Marc Andreessen: "C++?"