- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 06:54:28 +0200
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@mac.com>, Mike Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
> Le 22 mai 2019 à 04:08, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> a écrit : > > Agreed. But that's not at all in contradiction with sorting out this contingency plan early. Waiting for the Director to indicate that he plans to step down before we sort out the details would force us to do a rush job. Better be ready early than late. I started the discussion about the absolute need for a contingency plan with Ann Bassetti, then an AB member and far from her last mandate. How many years ago was that? I immediately told her that it was a fact the Director was mostly away, not conducting transition calls any more and everything on his radar was done « in the name of the Director » by someone else. The W3F was already there. I also discussed it with PLH probably 8 or 10 years ago during a lunch together in Paris, discussed it several times with many famous ACs, most ABs and I recall at least one chat with the CEO. Everyone, absolutely everyone, says in private we must do it ASAP and has said it for ten years, ahem. In public, that’s a different story. Speaking of rush in case of problem, we’re not early. We are terribly late and I call that a dangerous lack of management. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2019 04:55:02 UTC