- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:51:53 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1505159513.2752.143.camel@w3.org>
TAG, I am asking for your guidance on something that has been awkward and unresolved for some time. For Automotive we are defining a service that will reside on a vehicle's local network. This service is not meant to be addressed publicly, ever, out of privacy and security considerations. In the present spec draft we have a hard-coded hostname, wwwivi. It will be used in wss:// and potentially later https:// URIs. Appending .localhost or .localdomain will add some clarity. The local network should be able to handle resolution of any hostname. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/team-auto/2017Sep/0011.html I would suspect there may be similar concerns for Web of Things, Second Screen and other activities. They may be more suitable to network discovery protocols due to adhoc nature of things and screen services becoming available on a network. We feel it would be preferable to be rigidly defined to prevent eg an impersonating service or introducing latency. -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.org
Received on Monday, 11 September 2017 19:51:55 UTC