W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Obsoleting some specifications

From: Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:15:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CALiHrgn=B6Bj5tYP2ETdDSryay1B_bVeg=a9U65o2fXL=uogHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Public TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Thanks Chaals ! The W3C dea^Hprecation panel stands ready to dispose. When
we last discussed this with plh I suggested we might create a special
issues register on github for this so we can better keep track of these
reuqetss and subsequent discussion. Dan

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017, 15:28 <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

>
>
> 26.04.2017, 06:56, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:
> > On 2017/04/26 11:32, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> >
> >>  MathML 1 and 2 - there is a version 3
> >
> > Not speaking to the specifics of MathML, but just the fact that there is
> > a new version alone may not be enough to deprecate previous versions.
>
> Agreed, as a general principle, and that should certainly be considered in
> the case of MathML...
>
> cheers
>
> > There may be implementations that only support the previous version, in
> > some cases for good reasons. As an example, I remember that at least at
> > some point in time, there was no open-source implementation of XSLT 2.0,
> > and browsers also just support XSLT 1.0.
> >
> > Regards, Martin.
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - standards - Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 08:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:15 UTC